000 | 03292nam a22004577a 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
003 | OSt | ||
005 | 20240305193734.0 | ||
008 | 221123b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d | ||
028 | _b Phone: +255 28 298 3384 | ||
028 | _b Fax: +255 28 298 3386 | ||
028 | _b Email: vc@bugando.ac.tz | ||
028 | _b Website: www.bugando.ac.tz | ||
040 |
_bEnglish _cDLC |
||
041 | _aEnglish | ||
100 |
_aNelly Mwageni _930498 |
||
222 | _aLeprosy epidemiology case detection delay Tanzania | ||
245 | _aLeprosy epidemiological trends and diagnosis delay in three districts of Tanzania: A baseline study | ||
260 |
_aMwanza, Tanzania: _b Leprosy Review & _b Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences [CUHAS – Bugando] _c2022/9/1 |
||
300 | _a Pages 209-223 | ||
490 | _v Leprosy Review Volume 93 Issue 3 | ||
520 | _aAbstract: Objectives: Leprosy, also known as Hansen’s disease, is a slowly progressive and chronic infectious neglected tropical disease (NTD) caused by Mycobacterium leprae. This study was performed to assess the epidemiological trend of leprosy in the past five years in the three study districts in Tanzania in which a leprosy prevention intervention study (PEP4LEP) is implemented, and to determine the case detection delay at baseline. Methods: Secondary data from the leprosy registry of the National Tuberculosis and Leprosy Program of Tanzania from 2015 to 2019 were used to describe the epidemiological trends of leprosy for the three study districts: Morogoro, Mvomero, and Lindi district council. A cross-sectional study was also conducted to assess the delay in leprosy diagnosis at baseline. The chi-square test was used to calculate statistical significance. Results: Between 2015 and 2019, 657 new leprosy cases were detected in three districts. Of those cases, 247 (37.6%) were female patients, 5 (0.8%) had a grade 2 disability (G2D) and 516 (78.5%) had multibacillary (MB) leprosy. From the 50 adult leprosy patients interviewed for detection delay, 16 (32.0%) were females and 38 (76.0%) had MB leprosy. Overall, a mean case detection of 28.1 months (95% CI 21.5–34.7) and a median of 21.5 months were observed. Conclusion: The three PEP4LEP study districts remain highly endemic, with long case detection delays observed that increase the risk of disabilities and contribute to ongoing leprosy transmission. Integrating activities such as contact screening and provision of post-exposure prophylaxis are therefore a necessary strategy in these endemic areas. | ||
700 |
_a Stephen E Mshana _915820 |
||
700 |
_a Jan Hendrik Richardus _945686 |
||
700 |
_a Christa Kasang _923005 |
||
700 |
_aLiesbeth Mieras _945675 |
||
700 |
_aRobin van Wijk _945687 |
||
700 |
_aAnne Schoenmakers _945674 |
||
700 |
_aThomas Hambridge _945688 |
||
700 |
_aJohn E Masenga _945783 |
||
700 |
_a Saida Kidula _945784 |
||
700 |
_aReuben Hebron _945785 |
||
700 |
_a William Mayunga _945786 |
||
700 |
_aShigela Marco _945787 |
||
700 |
_a Abdallah Pegwa _945788 |
||
700 |
_aPhellister Nyakato _945789 |
||
700 |
_aDeusdedit Kamara _945790 |
||
700 |
_a Riziki Kisonga _945791 |
||
700 |
_a Blasdus Njako _945676 |
||
856 | _uhttps://leprosyreview.org/article/93/3/20-22017 | ||
942 |
_2ddc _cVM |
||
999 |
_c19624 _d19624 |