000			03869nam a22003377a 4500
003			OSt
005			20240305193724.0
008			221110b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
028			_b Phone: +255 28 298 3384
028			_b Fax: +255 28 298 3386
028			_bEmail: vc@bugando.ac.tz
028			_b Website: www.bugando.ac.tz
040			_cDLC
041			_aEnglish
100			_aDaniel W. Gunda _922748
222			_aLiver cirrhosis, Esophageal varices, Non-invasive predictors, Northwestern Tanzania,
245			_aThe magnitude and correlates of esophageal Varices among newly diagnosed cirrhotic patients undergoing screening fibre optic endoscope before incident bleeding in North-Western Tanzania _ba cross-sectional study
260			_aMwanza: _bBMC Gastroenterology & _b Tanzania Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences [CUHAS – Bugando] _c2019
300			_aPages 1-9
490			_vBMC Gastroenterology
520			_aAbstract Background: Bleeding esophageal varices is a deadly complication of liver cirrhosis. Guidelines recommend an early diagnosis of esophageal varices before incident bleeding by screening all patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis. Though it has been reported elsewhere that the presence of esophageal varices varies widely among cirrhotic patients this has not been assessed in Tanzania since endoscopy is not readily available for routine use in our setting. This study was designed to determine the prevalence of esophageal varices and assess the utility of clinical parameters in predicting the presence of varices among cirrhotic patients in northwestern Tanzania. Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of adult patients with liver cirrhosis was done at Bugando Medical Centre. Demographic, clinical, laboratory and endoscopic data were collected and analyzed using STATA 13. The presence of esophageal varices was detected using endoscopic examination and associated factors were assessed by logistic regression. The predictive value of clinical predictors was also assessed by calculating sensitivity and specificity. Results: A total of 223 patients were enrolled, where 88 (39.5%; 95%CI: 33.0–45.9) had esophageal varices. The varices were independently associated with increased age (OR: 1.02; 95%CI: 1.0–1.04; p = 0.030); increased splenic diameter (OR:1.3; 95%CI:1.2–1.5; p < 0.001), increased portal vein diameter (OR:1.2; 95%CI: 1.07–1.4; p = 0.003), having ascites (OR: 3.0; 95%CI: 1.01–8.7; p = 0.046), and advanced liver disease (OR: 2.9; 95%CI: 1.3–6.7; p = 0.008). PSDR least performed in predicting varices, (AUC: 0.382; 95%CI: 0.304–0.459; cutoff: < 640; Sensitivity: 58.0%; 95%CI: 46.9–68.4; specificity: 57.0%; 95%CI: 48.2–65.5). SPD had better prediction; (AUC: 0.713; 95%CI: 0.646–0.781; cut off: > 15.2 cm; sensitivity: 65.9%; (95% CI: 55–75.7 and specificity:65.2%; 95%CI: 56.5–73.2), followed by PVD, (AUC: 0.6392; 95%CI: 0.566–0.712;cutoff: > 1.45 cm; sensitivity: 62.5%; 95CI: 51.5–72.6; specificity: 61.5%; 95%CI: 52.7–69.7). Conclusion: Esophageal varices were prevalent among cirrhotic patients, most of which were at risk of bleeding. The non-invasive prediction of varices was not strong enough to replace endoscopic diagnosis. However, the predictors in this study can potentially assist in the selection of patients at high risk of having varices and prioritize them for endoscopic screening and appropriate management.
700			_aSemvua B. Kilonzo _922704
700			_aZakhia Mamballah _922924
700			_a Paulina M. Manyiri _922925
700			_aDavid C. Majinge _922926
700			_a Hyasinta Jaka _919670
700			_aBenson R. Kidenya _922909
700			_aHumphrey D. Mazigo _922835
856			_uhttps://bmcgastroenterol.biomedcentral.com/counter/pdf/10.1186/s12876-019-1123-9.pdf
942			_2ddc _cVM
999			_c19356 _d19356