000 03040nam a22003377a 4500
003 OSt
005 20240305193717.0
008 221011b |||||||| |||| 00| 0 eng d
022 _a Online ISSN 1557-3265
022 _aPrint ISSN 1078-0432
028 _b Phone: +255 28 298 3384
028 _b Fax: +255 28 298 3386
028 _bEmail: vc@bugando.ac.tz
028 _b Website: www.bugando.ac.tz
040 _cDLC
041 _aEnglish
100 _aDylan Z Dieters-Castator
_944669
245 _aProteomics-Derived Biomarker Panel Improves Diagnostic Precision to Classify Endometrioid and High-grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma
260 _aMwanza, Tanzania:
_bAmerican Association for Cancer Research &
_b Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences [CUHAS – Bugando]
_c2019/7/15
300 _aPages 4309-4319
490 _v Clinical Cancer Research Volume 25 Issue 14
520 _aAbstract Purpose: Ovarian carcinomas are a group of distinct diseases classified by histotypes. As histotype-specific treatment evolves, accurate classification will become critical for optimal precision medicine approaches. Experimental Design: To uncover differences between the two most common histotypes, high-grade serous (HGSC) and endometrioid carcinoma, we performed label-free quantitative proteomics on freshly frozen tumor tissues (HGSC, n = 10; endometrioid carcinoma, n = 10). Eight candidate protein biomarkers specific to endometrioid carcinoma were validated by IHC using tissue microarrays representing 361 cases of either endometrioid carcinoma or HGSC. Results: More than 500 proteins were differentially expressed (P < 0.05) between endometrioid carcinoma and HGSC tumor proteomes. A ranked set of 106 proteins was sufficient to correctly discriminate 90% of samples. IHC validated KIAA1324 as the most discriminatory novel biomarker for endometrioid carcinoma. An 8-marker panel was found to exhibit superior performance for discriminating endometrioid carcinoma from HGSC compared with the current standard of WT1 plus TP53 alone, improving the classification rate for HGSC from 90.7% to 99.2%. Endometrioid carcinoma–specific diagnostic markers such as PLCB1, KIAA1324, and SCGB2A1 were also significantly associated with favorable prognosis within endometrioid carcinoma suggesting biological heterogeneity within this histotype. Pathway analysis of proteomic data revealed differences between endometrioid carcinoma and HGSC pertaining to estrogen and interferon signalling. Conclusions: In summary, these findings support the use of multi-marker panels for the differential diagnosis of difficult cases resembling endometrioid carcinoma and HGSC.
700 _a Peter F Rambau
_922887
700 _aLinda E Kelemen
_944488
700 _aGabrielle M Siegers
_944670
700 _aGilles A Lajoie
_944671
700 _aLynne-Marie Postovit
_944672
700 _aMartin Köbel
_944499
856 _y https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3818
942 _2ddc
_cVM
999 _c19149
_d19149