Abstract:

Introduction: Irrational antifungals prescription results in inappropriate use of antifungals, leading to emergence of antifungal resistance.

Aim: To determine the prescription patterns of antifungal agents in gynaecology and oncology departments of the tertiary hospital in Tanzania.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective hospital-based study involving files of patients who attended gynaecology and oncology department of Bugando Medical Centre between January 2017 and December 2017. All files of patients with fungal infections were analysed. Checklist was used to collect information such as clinical diagnosis, age, name of antifungal, number of antifungals, dosage form and dose frequency. Descriptive analysis was done using STATA version 13.0.

Results: A total of 1,070 files of patients who attended gynaecology and oncology departments in the year 2017 were retrieved, of which 860 (80.4%) were from patients who attended gynaecology department. A total of 156 (14.6%) files out of 1,070 were of patients with fungal infections. Of the patients from gynaecology 116 (n=860, 13.48%) had fungal infection. While of the patients from oncology 40 (n=210, 19.1%) had fungal infection. The most common fungal infection diagnosed were vaginal candidiasis 112 (96.6%) and oral candidiasis 33 (82.5%) from gynaecology and oncology department, respectively. Common antifungal prescribed were azoles (clotrimazole 56.9% in gynaecology and fluconazole 37.5% in oncology). The prevalence of irrational antifungal prescription in gynaecology and oncology departments was 22.4% (26/116) and 20% (8/40), respectively.

Conclusion: About one in five antifungal prescriptions for vaginal candidiasis in gynaecology and oral candidiasis in oncology are irrational as evidenced in standard treatment guideline. Clinicians should adhere to the national standard treatment guidelines in order to reduce irrational prescriptions of antifungal agents.